Mini-post: maymay’s fetlife exporter tool
If you weren’t currently conscious, Fetlife has established that to steadfastly keep up their relationship making use of their bank card processor, they should delete a substantial amount of content. We hate that credit card issuers have to police exactly exactly what we could explore, but I am able to realize why the Fetlife group decided to help keep your website running over fighting the good battle, losing the capability to just simply take bank card re re payments, rather than to be able to process sufficient re re payments to help keep the ability on.
Because folks are (rightfully) stressed their pictures/writings/comments/etc shall be deleted, they’ve been utilizing the hell away from maymay’s exporter tool, that is actually driving up his expenses.
He might use some assistance maintaining that device operating if you’re inclined to donate.
Share this:
- Simply Simply Click to talk about on Twitter (Opens in brand brand new screen)
- Simply Simply Click to generally share on Facebook (Opens in new screen)
Associated
9 thoughts on “ Mini-post: maymay’s fetlife exporter device ”
Many thanks because of this. I obtained some e-mail today confirming that folks that are currently talking about this payment processor censorship problem are scared to also point out on FetLife that this device exists simply because they think stating that can get them prohibited from FetLife. May seem like the censorship problem just isn’t one-sided, but that is barely a shock if you ask me.
Anyhow, once more, thank you for sign boosting this. For many 
interested, the way that is best to donate is by my “cyberbusking” page.
No user happens to be prohibited from FetLife for making use of a script! No member happens to be threatened with being prohibited. This is certainly therefore ridiculous.
All we ask why these tools never be agreed to people. They are able to have severe effects which can be straight affecting our users.
Susan Wright FetLife Community Manager
We understand the new task is always to do pr for FetLife (BitLove, Inc.), but I’m going to assume good faith on your component and certainly will react beneath the presumption which you misread my comment, above. You are suggested by me re-read it.
I acquired some e-mail today confirming that individuals who will be currently talking about this re payment processor censorship problem are frightened to also point out on FetLife that this device exists them banned from FetLife because they think saying that will get.
No user happens to be prohibited from FetLife for making use of a script! No user was threatened with being prohibited. This is certainly so ridiculous.
You aren’t giving an answer to the facts associated with the situation, Susan. Whether you’ve got prohibited or threatened to ban anybody isn’t the presssing problem, since you can find users whom nevertheless worry being prohibited.
This fear exists it doesn’t matter how you you will need to replace the topic of discussion.
Reality: you will find FetLife users concerned with being prohibited from FetLife simply for connecting to a script which they want to make use of which will make themselves feel safer about utilizing FetLife. Browse my remark and, once again, note this is exactly what I said. More over, i’ve been hearing these concerns in face-to-face conversations with FetLife users since October, 2012.
I want to act as much more clear: Whether or perhaps not some one happens to be prohibited for making use of a script, it is an undeniable fact there are some in your individual base whom worry due to their reports with tools your company publicly discouraged using if they try to protect themselves.
It’s no key your business has delivered me personally a few DMCA takedown notices because you chose to ignore my counter-notices that you de-facto admitted were frivolous. We remind you that knowingly delivering frivolous DMCA takedown notices is just a united states federal offense. Users that are utilizing the FetLife Exporter connected into the above post are doing this for any amount of their very own reasons, and I also could be very happy to offer FetLife, free of charge, rule that will make it easy for users to help keep backup archives of the very own information.
The things I find ridiculous is they have clearly expressed a desire to do for their own safety that you are refusing to offer your own users the ability to do something.
This will make your invocation of community security either totally ridiculous or patently disingenuous.
Maymay FetLife Community Muckraker
Well, that’s quite the deceptive small declaration here.
No member happens to be prohibited for using a script… sure. That’s believable.
But that’s not the matter. The issue is *sharing* or *making a script available* or *informing individuals of the presence of a script* gets you threatened with a ban.
John Baku himself threatened me personally having a ban for an easy script we had written restoring functions to my web web browser if he could actually prevent it) that he was pointlessly disabling (because there are about four slightly harder ways of doing things he was trying to “prevent”, as.
I did son’t also speak about the script on Fetlife. He saw it for a site that is entirely different posted underneath the exact same title i personally use every-where, and threatened me personally having a ban.
He could be perhaps perhaps maybe not a fantastic individual, and also the web web site is certainly not a good spot.
Fetlife hasn’t prohibited folks from utilizing this script….. merely deactivated their records until they operate the tool that is delete. Keeping a free account hostage doesn’t count appropriate?
Leave a reply that is reply cancel
This website makes use of Akismet to cut back spam. Understand how your remark information is prepared.