Erm, I do not understand if i am describing this precisely. Essentially, when you don’t…

Erm, I do not understand if i am describing this precisely. Essentially, when you don’t…

Essentially, if you do not care whether you are out participate in conversations while you would with individuals you’re down with, but there is you don’t need to announce such a thing, just solution truthfully when they ask. If they are spouting down particular prejudices about bis, go on and state those do not affect you. If the issue is gay/bi rights in basic, argue it through the standpoint of a being that is human maybe not someone playing the straw guy homo card to pull some heartstrings to your part. posted by schroedinger at 2:41 PM on 23, 2005 I like xo’s analogy about mothers with dead children august. A great deal. Thanks, xo, I’d been to locate a good one.

grahamwell, i am actually confused regarding the confusion:

In less contexts that are political, such as for instance everybody speaing frankly about the attractiveness of a female, me personally saying she’s not too hot, one member of the family saying, “oh yeah? she wouldn’t make that line is crossed by you? (smirk, wink)”. That discussion could just happen in an assumed context that is heterosexual a guy (clearly). Or have you any idea one thing I do not? This just how we view it: Anon’s in legislation: “cannot you might think Paris Hilton is hot?” Anon (feminine): “No, ew.” Anon’s in legislation: “Oh yeah? She would not make that line is crossed by you? smirk, wink.” (presumption of anon’s heterosexuality) Anon (feminine): thinks “No, ew, but Maura Tierney, hoo child!” but states absolutely absolutely absolutely nothing. 继续阅读Erm, I do not understand if i am describing this precisely. Essentially, when you don’t…