United States Of America District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.
Whenever plaintiff filed its grievance, it desired an initial injunction to stop defendant from enforcing the ordinance that is allegedly unconstitutional. Defendant reacted towards the movement and presented a movement for summary judgment at the time that is same asserting that the appropriate maxims determining the motions had been equivalent. Defendant asked that its movement for summary judgment be addressed without enabling time that is plaintiff development, arguing that any development is unneeded. We agreed that finding will never help plaintiff (because legislative choices are “not at the mercy of courtroom factfinding and might be predicated on logical speculation unsupported by proof or empirical information, and provided its counsel a way to advise the court whether he desired the opportunity for extra briefing; he composed towards the court on August 12, 2004, to express that extra briefing wouldn’t be necessary and that the court should check out determine the movement. 继续阅读Finally, plaintiff does not have any help for the contention that the ordinance is preempted by state legislation.